2009年3月23日星期一
The U.S. remains the top buyer of Venezuelan oil despite long-standing political tensions.
My Plan for Bad Bank Assets
The private sector will set prices. Taxpayers will share in any upside.
By TIMOTHY GEITHNER wsj
U.S. Rounding Up Investors to Buy Bad Assets
Stimulus Dilemma for China
Spending on Public Works Risks Making Production Glut Worse
难为市场经济
the reform of education in us
A better way to fix the banks
Here’s a plan that could solve the toxic-asset pricing problem voluntarily—without requiring Uncle Sam to nationalize the whole industry—and make (pretty much) everyone a winner.
市场前后
2009年3月22日星期日
Now Is No Time to Give Up on Markets
一、经济可能复苏
一、经济肯定会复苏,时间长短未知
put lend interet under zero!how dare you say that!
西方学者应该接受的另一个学说
搜索论文就两步
russia's rule of lawlessness
一、公民的法律意识,这需要一代的教育
Why Foreign Aid Is Hurting Africa
Money from rich countries has trapped many African nations in a cycle of corruption, slower economic growth and poverty. Cutting off the flow would be far more beneficial, says Dambisa Moyo.
2009年3月21日星期六
David Brooks、Paul Krugman、Greg Mankiw都说奥巴马做得不好,但是借口不一样!
2009年3月20日星期五
塔利班和游击队
House Passes Heavy Tax on Bonuses at Rescued Firms
2009年3月19日星期四
Would an AIG-Bonus Tax Pass Constitutional Muster? (A Tribe Calls ‘Yes!’)
It’s the puzzle of the week down in Washington: how to get the money back from the AIG bonus-recipients. As we’ve written before, the Obama administration seems inclined not to play legal hardball for a variety of reasons, one of which seems to be that it could wind up on the hook for more than it would stand to recover.
The most current proposal: tax the bejeezus out of the recipients. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and other congressional Democrats have proposed a 91 percent tax. There are problems with this, too. The NYT writes that some of the AIG employees are thought to be foreigners based in offices abroad and not liable for U.S. taxes.
But could such a tax also run into Constitutional problems? Some pundits (for example, here and here) have suggested yes. The most commonly mentioned difficulties include the prohibitions on so-called Bills of Attainder and retroactive laws (laws passed Ex Post Facto) mentioned in Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution. Other possible problems brought to our attention deal with the Contract Clause of the Article I, Section 10; the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment; and the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
For a little help with this, we turned to Harvard’s Laurence Tribe, he of the canonized treatise “American Constitutional Law.” In an email exchange, we asked Tribe to address each of the five possible constitutional problems and he determined none of them likely poses a problem.
Bill of Attainder: Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution prohibits Congress from passing Bills of Attainder, laws that punish a single person or specific group of people without affording them a trial. Would a law that targeted AIG executives violate the prohibition on Bills of Attainder?
Responded Tribe:
I do think Congress (and the Executive Branch) could avoid serious Bill of Attainder problems by passing a sufficiently broad law … rather than targeting a closed class of named executives even though the prohibition against Bills of Attainder, unlike that against Ex Post Facto laws, potentially reaches civil as well as criminal penalties.
Ex Post Facto: Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution also, generally speaking, prohibits Congress from passing laws that apply retroactively. Would a law that imposed a tax on past-gotten earnings violate the Ex Post Facto Clause?
Responded Tribe:
The Ex Post Facto Clause applies exclusively to criminal punishment and poses no difficulty here. And the fact that the measure contemplated would operate retroactively as well as prospectively doesn’t distinguish it from any number of tax and other financial measures that the Supreme Court has upheld over the claim that fundamental fairness precludes retroactively undoing contractual obligations.
The Contract Clause: Article 1, Section 10 of the Constitution states: “No state shall . . . pass any Law . . . impairing the Obligation of Contracts.” Now, what about this? With the passage of the law, wouldn’t the government effectively be impairing contracts made between AIG and its executives?
Tribe had a quick dispatch for the ol’ Contract Clause:
The Contract Impairment Clause applies exclusively to state legislation and has no federal counterpart that would pose any difficulty in this setting.
The Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment: The Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment states: “No person shall be . . . deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”
On the issue of procedural due process — generally speaking, on whether a person is given adequate access to the legal system and its procedures — Tribe said this also isn’t a problem.
There’s no suggestion that people would be targeted for payback obligations without notice and a fair opportunity to be heard on questions such as mistaken identity, so procedural due process would be satisfied.
On the issue of substantive due process — that is, whether a “liberty” has been taken away by a given act of Congress — Tribe said:
And, as to substantive due process, the only relevant requirement would be that the challenged measure be rationally calculated to achieve a legitimate government purpose, something nobody could deny in this instance.
The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment: The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment states: ” . . . nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” The clause is the one that requires payment for property “taken” by the government’s eminent domain power — the power to, say, grab a piece of property to build a public road. In response to our question on whether tax on AIG executives might constitute an unconstitutional “taking,” Tribe responded:
Tax measures [generally speaking] are simply not vulnerable to challenge under the Takings Clause. . . The point of the Takings Clause is to require compensation for the fair market value of private property validly confiscated for the public’s benefit, not to prevent the exaction of a tax that Congress is within its constitutional authority to impose.
The Daily Me
When we go online, each of us is our own editor, our own gatekeeper. We select the kind of news and opinions that we care most about.
Nicholas Negroponte of M.I.T. has called this emerging news product The Daily Me. And if that’s the trend, God save us from ourselves.
market myopia
Study Shows First-Time Online Donors Often Do Not Return
People who go online to donate to charity for the first time often do not return to the Internet to make later gifts, according to a newstudy examining the experience of 24 nonprofit groups.
The findings suggest that while the Internet can be a valuable fund-raising tool for charities, particularly in soliciting gifts after disasters like Hurricane Katrina, it is not a replacement for direct mail or other forms of fund-raising.
“Online giving is higher than offline giving, and the demographics of online givers are more attractive — better educated, higher income,” said Tobias Smith, director of online communications at CARE, which took part in the study and works on issues faced by poor women. “But how you get people to routinely give online is a nut no one has yet cracked.”
The study was done by Target Analytics, a unit of Blackbaud Inc., which provides software and services to nonprofit groups.
为什么美国没有网址导航?
2009年3月18日星期三
Is Obamanomics Conservative or Revolutionary?
The basic idea of Reaganomics was that the economy grows from the top down. Lower taxes on the wealthy make them work harder and invest more, and the benefits trickle down to everyone else. Rarely in economic history has a theory been more tested in the real world and proven so wrong. In point of fact, nothing trickled down. After the Reagan tax cuts, increases in the median wage slowed, adjusted for inflation. After George W. Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy, the median wage actually dropped. Meanwhile, most of the income went to the top. In 1980, just before the Reagan revolution, the richest 1 percent took home 9 percent of total national income. But by 2007, the richest 1 percent was taking home 22 percent.
2009年3月17日星期二
The Commercial Republic
revolution
赤壁和试错法
诸葛亮:什么都略懂一点,生活就多彩一些。
工程经济学?
非常个案 中船重工调节利润
经过一系列审计程序之后,中国船舶重工集团公司 (下称 “中船重工”)2008年财务报告形成在即,此时,一则据称是“来自上级政府部门”的通知使得这一收尾工作被迫延后。
参与中船重工年报审计的注册会计师3月12日对本报称,中船重工突然通知先不要出审计报告,2008年的利润要调低一点。刚开始以为这是中船重工内部的决策,但随后他被告知:这是“上级”的要求,“2009年是个困难的年份,把国企2008年的利润调低一点是为2009年继续保持增长打下基础”。
这不是个案。“同行的一些其他注册会计也遇到了类似的情况。”这位注册会计师称
上述注册会计师称,国企的利润最讲究艺术,做低了不行,达不到考核的要求,做高了也不行,还要为下一年的增长留下余地。
2009年3月15日星期日
My New Twitter Flock
After I wrote about Twitter last week, I went almost overnight from feeling like no one was listening to having 1,683 followers.
My large flock of followers, or people who signed up to receive my Twitter messages, showed me that Twitter wasn't just people shouting into a virtual abyss. Actual conversations were going on. Members of my newfound audience were soon sending me messages, or tweets, constantly, letting me know they welcomed, expected and wanted my feedback. It was part of being part of a community, they said.
I realized Twitter -- the mass text-messaging service that lets you send out 140-character messages to a group of followers -- wasn't just about broadcasting. While I had held off replying to people in the past for fear my replies would be viewed as spam since they hit everyone, my new flock was telling me to start hitting reply all.
2009年3月14日星期六
The Rules Apply To Everyone
Smart Management for Tough Times
Reading the Body Language of Leadership
2009年3月13日星期五
They Tried to Outsmart Wall Street
Wal-Mart Plans to Market Digital Health Records System
大家应该听过云计划,初衷是统筹运用资源,但是可以借鉴到这,农民等人不是不会装系统不会装软件吗,不是不会打字吗,完全可以通过云计划来一个规模效应。
Capitalism Beyond the Crisis
www.4trillion.com
Smart Grids for Smart Energy Marketing
2009年3月11日星期三
In Afghanistan, Less Can Be More
2009年3月10日星期二
2009年3月9日星期一
How to Twitter
2009年3月8日星期日
三条标准“丈量”居民企业 假外资难了
据本报了解,目前已经有诸多外企争相寻找会计师事务所或者律师事务所重新设计控股结构和收入结构,希望能够未雨绸缪,避免成为中国居民企业。
另有业内人士指出《办法》认定居民企业的条款过于苛刻,不具有实际操作性,在实际认定中容易造成理解上的分歧,甚至摩擦。例如,《办法》中对于企业的50%以上的经营收入来源于中国境内的说法过于模糊,税收机关很容易做出一个宽泛的解释,或将不利于国际贸易的正常开展。
真的很难。
家电下乡,资源扭曲配置
主板涨、硬盘涨……
2009年3月7日星期六
重申smartout.cn
china economy tops NPC agenda
On the Web, No One Can Hear You Scream
direct market
2009年3月6日星期五
80-20
一、减少政府对经济的干预,因为公权力是任何一个个体无法竞争的;而且有钱人显然更能从政府获得资源
声音
2009年3月5日星期四
集团业务 PK 个人业务
小农贷款
2009年3月4日星期三
Facebook Connect + Facebook Ads = A Social Ad Network
Citigroup Chair Says Bankers Will Keep it Simple
“I’m asked quite often, are institutions too large to manage? What is undoubtedly true is that large institutions — complex institutions — require superior management,” Bischoff said. “You need rules that have stood the test of time. What we have seen is institutions that aren’t necessarily too large, but that have become very complex.” “It is possible to have big banks,” Malladi said. “It is possible to have unified global institutions as long as there’s a way to manage all this complexity.”
“We should keep in mind the difference between market mistakes and market failure.” Actions will have to be sorted through to see which require public policy interventions and which don’t, he said, noting that a useful guide might be to determine whether or not people have learned from their mistakes or whether they will repeat them.
Bischoff predicted: “Regulation may change, and that may actually help in terms of transparency.”
市场
2009年3月2日星期一
Card Issuers: How Can We Make You Go Away?
With defaults on the rise, credit-card issuers are employing all sorts of tactics to persuade consumers to reduce their balances and, ideally, close their accounts. Some issuers are using carrots: American Express is offering some cardholders a $300 gift certificate if they zero out their balance by April 30, and Citibank is offering to match a portion of the payments some cardholders make beyond the minimum amount due. Others are using sticks: Chase is tacking on a $10 monthly fee to the accounts of consumers who have carried a large balance for more than two years.
向传统自由市场交换经济理论调整or只是班门弄斧
金融市场,很好理解,不完全竞争的,政府控制的,信息不对称的,对货币的需求有投资需求和消费。
货币是否真的多了?
“年末广义货币供应量(M2)余额为47.5万亿元,比上年末增长17.8%;狭义货币供应量(M1)余额为16.6万亿元,增长9.1%;流通中现金(M0)余额为3.4万亿元,增长12.7%。年末全部金融机构本外币各项存款余额47.8万亿元,增长19.3%;全部金融机构本外币各项贷款余额32.0万亿元,增长17.9%。”
“全年国内生产总值300670亿元”
美国每年的GDP中消费占了80%。每年只留下20%没被消费,而货币供应量就是一年GDP的10多倍。



